Murrysville officials budgeting funds to address storm water damage |

Murrysville officials budgeting funds to address storm water damage

Patrick Varine
Tribune-Review file

As Murrysville officials look at potential capital improvements over the next five years, one issue is starting to consume a larger percentage of the capital budget — damage from storm water.

“We lost half of Beighley Road with the storm that came through Plum a couple weeks ago, and we need to replace a culvert there,” Murrysville Chief Administrator Jim Morrison told council members at their Aug. 7 meeting. “An old ‘tin whistle pipe,’ (an older-style, corrugated metal culvert) has collapsed and impacted a backyard on North Hills Road, and we have another on Sardis Road.”

Morrison said he plans to address the North Hills Road pipe collapse first, and proposed spending about $10,000 on engineering design work.

“We’ve put money into the capital improvement plan to address these problems moving forward,” Morrison said. “That’s something we’ll probably continue to do, because this issue doesn’t look to be going away anytime soon.”

The five-year capital improvement plan lays out about $535,000 dedicated to storm water-related issues like detention pond maintenance, storm sewer maintenance and compliance with the state’s MS4 requirements, which must be followed by all communities with a storm water conveyance system that is separate from its sewage conveyance system.

The municipality was also made aware that a plastic storm water pipe in the relatively new Heritage Estates development “was not properly laid or back-filled,” Morrison said. “It runs through a number of backyards there and has collapsed, and the pipe is about 27 feet deep. (Public works doesn’t) have the ability in-house to (fix) that. Before the end of the year, we’ll probably have to have an engineering investigation of that to determine some alternatives.”

Communities throughout the east suburbs are dealing with storm water issues that have been exacerbated by this spring and summer’s heavy rainfall.

In Export, borough officials are working to meet the next deadline in their state-approved long-term flood control plan by eliminating any connections that funnel storm water into the borough’s sewer pipes.

In Delmont, borough officials are working to finalize a consent agreement with the state’s Department of Environmental Protection to address sewage overflows believed to be caused by storm water infiltrating the sanitary sewer system.

And from a wider perspective, Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority board members are seeking to create a comprehensive picture of their entire system, in an effort to eliminate infiltration and inflow of storm water into their sewer pipes.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.