Murrysville’s massive voting precincts to be split after court grants petition |

Murrysville’s massive voting precincts to be split after court grants petition

Patrick Varine
Tribune-Review file
Mark Boggs, 63, of Murrysville walks to the end of the line of voters outside Newlonsburg Presbyterian Church on Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018. The line around 4 p.m. contained nearly 200 people.

When the 2020 election rolls around, more than 7,000 Murrysville residents won’t have to wait nearly as long to cast ballots.

A county judge on Friday signed off on a petition brought by Murrysville’s two major political committees, which seeks to break up two massively oversized voting precincts.

Lines at the Newlonsburg and Sardis precincts forced voters to wait hours in the 2016 general election and the 2018 midterms.

Both precincts contain more than 3,600 registered voters. That is three times the maximum size of a voter precinct, according to Pennsylvania election law. Precincts are not to exceed 1,200 “without good cause shown,” the law reads.

Across the county, voter rolls at 15 percent of precincts exceed the state’s 1,200-voter threshold, a Tribune-Review analysis showed in December 2018. All precincts in Murrysville are over the threshold.

Along with Newlonsburg and Sardis, Unity Township’s Dennison precinct is the only other in the county to have more than 3,000 registered voters. It has 3,400.

Below, video of the voting line at Newlonsburg Presbyterian during the 2018 midterm election.

“We’ll have to do an investigation based on the paperwork we got (Friday),” said Shari Wright, the county’s deputy elections director. “At this point, that won’t happen until after the (primary) election.”

Tom Wubben, chairman of the Murrysville Export Republican Committee, said Wright’s investigation could conclude that simply dividing each precinct would not be sufficient.

“She thinks we may need four new precincts instead of two to get closer to that 1,200 number,” Wubben said. “We’re very satisfied with just two, because that would at least cut each in half.”

Maury Fey, a Murrysville resident who helped prepare the petition, said that while there are other municipal precincts whose voter numbers are higher than 1,200, “they’re much less than 3,600 and they don’t experience any problems at all.”

Wubben added that with the difficulty elections officials have had in finding poll workers in recent years, two new precincts would be ideal “because there’d be a better chance of finding people to staff them.”

Sardis Fire Hall on Saltsburg Road and Emmanuel United Reformed Church of Christ on Hills Church Road were identified as potential new precincts at a recent meeting among Wubben, Fey, Murrysville Export Democratic Committee Chair Susan Stewart-Bayne and Murrysville Chief Administrator Jim Morrison.

“We looked at Murrysville’s street maps, which are updated much more regularly than the county’s, looked at voter rolls and figured out a way to split them up so that they’re about 1,800 voters each,” Wubben said.

That number still exceeds the state threshold, but both Wubben and Fey said they felt it would alleviate most of the issues Newlonsburg and Sardis voters have experienced.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.