ShareThis Page
New George Washington painting at Fort Ligonier will depict ‘friendly fire incident’ | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

New George Washington painting at Fort Ligonier will depict ‘friendly fire incident’

Stephen Huba
1068358_web1_gtr-ChasFagan-042519
Tribune-Review File
Ligonier native and sculptor Chas Fagan works on a sculpture of President Ronald Reagan in 2009.

Ligonier native and renowned sculptor Chas Fagan will unveil a new commission on George Washington at Fort Ligonier on Friday.

The unveiling of the painting “Flash Point,” about Washington’s “friendly fire incident” during the French and Indian War, will be held at the Fort Ligonier Association’s Annual Meeting at 5:30 p.m. Friday.

Fagan spoke about the “friendly fire incident” during a lecture series at Fort Ligonier in 2014. The painting was commissioned for the museum’s new George Washington Gallery.

The unveiling, including remarks by Fagan, will be held at the Fort Ligonier Center for History Education, 200 S. Market St., Ligonier.

Fagan, who lives with his family in Charlotte, N.C., is known for several high-profile commissions, including sculptures of President Ronald Reagan, astronaut Neil Armstrong and civil rights pioneer Rosa Park, as well as portraits of First Lady Barbara Bush and St. Teresa of Calcutta (Mother Teresa).

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.