North Huntingdon fireworks store sparks debate over building design |

North Huntingdon fireworks store sparks debate over building design

Joe Napsha
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Wholesale Fireworks building in North Huntingdon

A newly constructed fireworks store off Route 30 in North Huntingdon may have to close because of a dispute with the township over the company’s failure to construct the metal building’s facade according to the approved land development plan.

Township officials told Wholesale Fireworks representatives the Hubbard, Ohio, firm must present a revised plan for the facade at the commissioners’ July 17 meeting in order to be granted an extension of its June 21 temporary occupancy permit. The board intends to vote on extending the occupancy permit on Wednesday.

Pittsburgh attorney Shawn Gallagher, representing Wholesale Fireworks, requested a 30-day extension to allow the 5,700-square-foot store at 80 Gregg St. to remain open, saying a week was not sufficient time to develop a new plan.

The commissioners grilled company representatives on July 11 over Wholesale Fireworks’ failure to construct the building with the cut stone facade around the exterior, as had been approved in December. The architectural stone around the foundation of the building is not to window level, which was “an honest mistake,” Gallagher said.

“This is at the entrance way to the community. What you’ve given us kind of looks like a barn,” said Commissioner Brian Blasko, who spoke against the company’s initial plan for the building.

Commissioner Zachary Haigis said he wants stone on at least three sides of the building, as presented to the township. The intention was to have the company submit a plan and start the work, rather than get another extension, Haigis said.

Commissioner Darryl Bertani said he wants Wholesale Fireworks to build what it said it would, though he was willing to give the company 30 days to present the comprehensive plan.

“You now you want another 30 days to come up with another design. What have you been doing for 30 days?” asked Commissioner Tony Martino.

Wholesale Fireworks representative Greg McCandless said engineers told him three sides of the building would have to be removed to insert stone on the facade, or an entire foundation would have to be built at the site. To do the work, the business would have to close briefly, McCandless said.

Gallagher said conditions for obtaining the final occupancy permit “were not expressly stated” in the approval of the site plan. Furthermore, architects have told the company that cutting the building to insert the stone would be “crippling,” because a new foundation would have to be built.

Wholesale Fireworks was granted a temporary occupancy permit last month to sell firecrackers, sparklers and other pyrotechnics in the weeks leading up to the July 4 holiday — a period during which McCandless said 80 percent of its sales occur, and 90 percent happens on one day.

“The fireworks business is a lot like Santa Claus. It happens on one day,” McCandless said.

Gallagher said he did not want to be confrontational with North Huntingdon, but Wholesale Fireworks has options in the dispute, including going to Westmoreland County court.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.