North Huntingdon grants extension to fireworks company |

North Huntingdon grants extension to fireworks company

Joe Napsha
Tribune-Review file
Wholesale Fireworks building in North Huntingdon

Without much debate or verbal fireworks, North Huntingdon officials this week granted a fireworks company a 90-day extension of its temporary occupancy permit so it could attach the kind of facade the company had originally proposed around the base of its building off Route 30.

The commissioners approved the request from Wholesale Fireworks of Hubbard, Ohio, which provided a revised site plan for the facade of the building on Gregg Drive to planning director Andrew Blenko.

Sean Gallagher, a Pittsburgh attorney representing Wholesale Fireworks, told the commissioners Wednesday the company received a quote from a contractor, who promised to start work within two months, and finish within 30 days of starting.

Last month, the township had granted Wholesale Fireworks a temporary permit so that it could be open in the weeks prior to and including July 4, a time when a company official said about 80% of its business is conducted.

The metal frame building was constructed without any of the split-rock facade that township officials said Wholesale Fireworks had promised when North Huntingdon approved the site plan in December.

The commissioners and Gallagher verbally sparred last week over the facade. Greg McCandless, a Wholesale Fireworks representative, said he had made a mistake in understanding the agreement and the construction of the building was too far along to cut into the facade to insert the stone.

Commissioners had complained that the sight of the metal frame building, adjacent to the Pennsylvania Turnpike’s entrance ramp bridge over Route 30, should be improved because it is along one of the gateways into the township.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.