North Huntingdon may ask Corps of Engineers to inspect flooded areas |

North Huntingdon may ask Corps of Engineers to inspect flooded areas

Joe Napsha
Renatta Signorini | Tribune-Review
Janet Seman looks around in her mud-soaked basement after her home flooded on July 11.

North Huntingdon residents living along Brush Creek near the Irwin border are not optimistic that a tour of the creek by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will lead to any solution to their flooding problems.

“I don’t think they are going to do anything,” said Janet Seman, whose Westmoreland Avenue home off Route 993 was deluged by about 4 feet of water in the basement as a result of the July 11 storm that drenched the region.

Even if a proposal is made to solve the flooding, Seman said there is the problem of finding money to pay for it.

The North Huntingdon commissioners on Aug. 21 agreed to ask the Corps of Engineers to the tour section of Brush Creek and Long’s Run behind Roth Drive — sections that flooded homes and damaged property this summer.

Township manager Jeff Silka told the commissioners during an Aug. 15 meeting that if the Corps makes the visit, it will be to gather information that may result in options to solve the flooding. Then, it becomes a matter of conducting a cost-benefit analysis of the alternatives and what may be feasible.

“They’re not going to do any work,” if the Corps does tour the creeks, Silka said.

The recommendations or potential actions the Corps of Engineers takes is site specific, which is why a site visit is often needed to assess the problem, the Corps said in a statement. The solutions could range from a flood plain management plan, stormwater management recommendations to a larger structural or non-structural flood mitigation project.

The Corps of Engineers has money for technical assistance, if problems are identified, but money for larger efforts that lead to construction of a flood mitigation project are authorized under the continuing authorities program. Those local projects compete for funding at the national level, the spokesman said.

Seman’s Westmoreland Avenue neighbor, Terry Matthias, is not expecting any resolution soon.

“We’re getting slammed here all the time,” said Matthias, who had 3.5 feet of water in his basement last month.

The neighborhood gets flooded from the creek rising above its banks and from water backing up through the storm sewers, according to Matthias, who has lived in his home for 22 years. He believes the creekbed is narrower than in past years, which increases the potential for flooding.

“How many times do you have to replace your hot water heater,” Ruth Matthias said.

No easy solutions

With the need to develop plans and design measures to reduce, there is no easy solution to their flooding, said James Pillsbury, hydraulic engineer for the Westmoreland Conservation District.

“These take many years,” Pillsbury said.

It also may require taking people’s properties that lie within the flood zones. That is a costly, and often unpopular action because people don’t want to lose their homes, Pillsbury said.

While people look to dredging for a temporary solution, Pillsbury said the state Department of Environmental Protection views that “as a poor solution.” Dredging can destabilize the banks, which leads to more problems, he said.

Complicating matters is that both creeks flow through multiple jurisdictions and have large watersheds that have been impacted by development.

Brush Creek runs through or along several central Westmoreland municipalities — Hempfield, Jeannette, Penn Borough and Penn Township — before reaching North Huntingdon. The creek flows into Turtle Creek at Trafford.

Long’s Run flows from North Huntingdon into White Oak and McKeesport before emptying into the Youghiogheny River.

Showing frustration over being flooded multiple times, Matthais said, “nobody wants to help us.”

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.