ShareThis Page
North Huntingdon OKs Sheetz site plan; awaits request for liquor license | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

North Huntingdon OKs Sheetz site plan; awaits request for liquor license

Joe Napsha
1163778_web1_gtr-SheetzNorthHuntingdon-040419
A Norwin School bus drives to the front of Stewartsville Elementary School along Carpenter Lane in North Huntingdon to pick up a student.

North Huntingdon officials have approved Sheetz Inc.’s plans to expand its store along Route 30 so that it can meet state liquor laws in order to sell alcohol at the site.

Township commissioners Brian Blasko, Zachary Haigis, David Herold and Tony Martino voted to approve the site plans to expand the Sheetz store along Carpenter Lane by 560 square feet to provide sufficient space to seat 30 customers. The seating is a Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board requirement for the sale of alcohol under a restaurant liquor license. The store already meets requirements to sell food.

Commissioners Fran Bevan and Duane Kucera opposed the plans. Commissioner Darryl Bertani was absent.

The township planning commission last week recommended approval of the site plans. Grant Shaffer, a Sheetz project manager, said the Altoona-based convenience store chain will expand the store, regardless of whether it obtains approval of a liquor license for the site. Sheetz hopes to begin construction in June and have it completed within three months, Shaffer said.

Both Bevan and Kucera said after the meeting their opposition was rooted in Sheetz’ plans to sell beer across from Norwin’s Stewartsville Elementary School. They also vowed to oppose any attempt by Sheetz to win the board’s approval to transfer a liquor license into the township. North Huntingdon gets the authority to vote on whether to approve the transfer of the liquor license into the municipality.

After the meeting, Bevan said Sheetz already is selling alcohol at its two other stores in the township — at Ronda Court and at the intersection of Route 30 and North Thompson Lane.

“I don’t see a need for it,” Kucera said.

He said he hopes the LCB also will oppose Sheetz’ attempt to sell alcohol at that store.

“The ball is in their court,” Kucera said.

Sheetz has not notified North Huntingdon it wants to transfer a liquor license for that site, said Jeff Silka, township manager.

Blasko said that he would not oppose a liquor license transfer to that site.

“I don’t feel it is a safety issue,” said Blasko, a Yough middle school teacher. “I think it is more of an LCB issue.”

The Norwin School Board has notified the township and LCB that it opposes Sheetz’ plans to sell alcohol in such close proximity to the elementary school.

Barbara Viola, school board president, attended the meeting but did not express an opinion on the issue. Viola noted that the school district has already expressed its opposition to the plans.

Sheetz has sued the LCB in Centre County Court for denying the company a liquor license for a store near a Bald Eagle Area School District elementary school.

By opposing the transfer of a liquor license to that Sheetz store, North Huntingdon could find itself in a lawsuit, spending taxpayer money, Blasko said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.