North Huntingdon police bust Penn Hills man on marijuana charges |

North Huntingdon police bust Penn Hills man on marijuana charges

Joe Napsha

A Penn Hills man whose vehicle ran out of gas allegedly had 29 marijuana plants stuffed in multiple bags stashed in his car when North Huntingdon police arrested him early Wednesday morning.

Lamar D. Kincaid, 55, is accused of having several large garbage bags of marijuana plants about 3 feet tall in the vehicle’s back seat and trunk, Officer Mark Hamilton said in court papers. The roots were still attached.

Hamilton said he saw Kincaid’s Hyundai stopped on Clay Pike at 8:10 a.m. with emergency flashing lights activated. The officer followed Kincaid’s car as it traveled down Barnes Lake Road, but it apparently ran out of gas.

Kincaid then pushed the car from the outside and tried to steer it down hill, when he lost control.

The vehicle backed over a hill, hit two gas meters and a block wall, Hamilton stated.

Kincaid consented to a vehicle search and told police he had “a large amount of marijuana” in his car. Hamilton said he smelled marijuana on Kincaid and wafting from his car.

Kincaid was charged with possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent deliver. He was arraigned before North Huntingdon District Justice Wayne Gongaware and released on $10,000 unsecured bond.

He faces a preliminary hearing on Nov. 27 before Gongaware, and did not have an attorney listed in court papers.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.