North Huntingdon promotes 5 police officers |

North Huntingdon promotes 5 police officers

Joe Napsha

The North Huntingdon Police Department has two new lieutenants and three new sergeants.

Sgts. Gregory Arendas and Jay McCurdy were promoted to the rank of lieutenant by the township commissioners Wednesday. Officers Nicholas Dreistadt, William Kauffman and Justin Wardman were promoted to sergeant.

Arendas and McCurdy were the only two eligible to take the lieutenant’s test, while there were about seven officers eligible for the promotion after taking the test for sergeant, said Jeff Silka, township manager.

Arendas and McCurdy are the police department’s first lieutenants since Rodney Mahinske retired from the force last May. Mahinske had been the officer in the charge of the department after the commissioners fired former Chief Andrew Lisiecki in September 2016 in a controversial 4-3 vote.

The three officers replace three former sergeants. Sgts. Jeff Bouldin and David Sage retired last year and Robert Rizzo was a sergeant when he was named the officer in the charge of the department upon Mahinske’s retirement. The commissioners named him as chief last September.

The promotions were approved unanimously, except for Wardman’s. Commissioner Fran Bevan voted “present” — the equivalent of an abstention — on promoting Wardman.

Bevan said she cast that vote because Wardman joined with Officer Mark Hamilton in suing the township in Westmoreland County Court in 2017. The officers claimed they were unpaid while serving on active duty with the Pennsylvania National Guard.

Wardman received $42,000 in an out-of-court settlement the commissioners approved last December.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.