North Huntingdon to appeal zoning board OK of cell phone tower |

North Huntingdon to appeal zoning board OK of cell phone tower

Joe Napsha

North Huntingdon is taking its township zoning board to court over its decision to allow a cell phone tower to be built on property bordering Manor borough.

Township commissioners this week authorized an appeal to Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court. The zoning board on April 2 granted TowerCo 2013 of Cary. N.C., and Pittsburgh SMSA Limited Partnership a variance of an ordinance requiring a telecommunications tower be built at least the same distance from a property line as the tower’s height. TowerCo proposed building the 195-foot-monopole about 105 feet from the parcel’s border. Manor Borough owns the site along Oakside Drive, which is off Sandy Hill Road.

Pittsburgh attorney Joseph Cortese, who represented Pittsburgh SMSA and TowerCo at the zoning board’s April 2 hearing, could not be reached for comment. Verizon Wireless was a partner in the venture through Pittsburgh SMSA.

Zoning board solicitor George Butler said he could not comment on the issue. No township officials appeared at the zoning hearing board to express opposition to granting Verizon the variance, Butler said.

The zoning board ruled in the case because Verizon and TowerCo. had appealed zoning officer Thomas McGuire’s decision to deny a permit to build the tower at the site because of its proximity to the property line.

While the zoning ordinance was written to ensure a cell phone tower would not fall onto a neighbor’s property, a TowerCo official testified the monopoles are built to break in half at about the mid-point of the structure, not at the base. Monopoles in Florida withstood hurricane-strength winds, David Hockey, TowerCo’s zoning director, told the planning commission this month.

The planning commission in May recommended approval of TowerCo’s site plan, despite opposition from commissioner Virginia Stump.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.