North Huntingdon to hold hearing on cell phone tower |

North Huntingdon to hold hearing on cell phone tower

Joe Napsha

North Huntingdon officials will hold a public hearing this week on a request from Verizon Wireless for a variance to build a cell phone tower, an effort that is the target of a lawsuit by the township.

The commissioners scheduled a required public hearing for 6:30 p.m. Thursday on a request from Verizon Wireless and TowerCo 2013 LLC for a conditional use of a three-acre parcel along Oakside Drive for the construction of a 195-foot -tall monopole on land owned by Manor Borough.

In April, the township’s zoning hearing board granted Verizon Wireless and the Cary, N.C.-based TowerCo variances from the location requirements.

The township’s zoning officer, Thomas McGuire, previously denied Verizon a building permit because the site did not comply with township setback rules.

North Huntingdon filed a lawsuit in Westmoreland County Court against the zoning hearing board, TowerCo 2013 and Pittsburgh SMSA Ltd. Partnership, contending that Verizon Wireless failed to meet the requirements to receive a variance for the site.

The township has contended there are six wireless communications towers within a two mile radius of the proposed site. Verizon Wireless failed to show there was a significant gap in the coverage area and that the proposed remedy is the least obtrusive solution, the township claimed. It also said there was no testimony at the April 2 hearing that the property could not be developed within the rules of the ordinance.

Verizon Wireless has yet to file its response to the township’s objections.

The hearing will be held at the Towne House, 11279 Center Highway.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.