Norwin board members at odds over school budget |

Norwin board members at odds over school budget

Joe Napsha

Norwin School Board will meet Monday to vote on a 2019-20 budget that would include raising taxes by 3% for most of the district’s property owners and transfer $1.1 million from the fund balance to cover a shortfall.

Five votes are needed to approve the budget.

But during a meeting last week, only three members indicated they would support a $73.6 million spending plan that is similar to the preliminary version approved by the board in May. A 3% tax hike is the largest the district could approve under the state’s adjusted index, without getting approval from the Education Department.

Real estate taxes would increase in the Westmoreland County portion of the district — Irwin, North Huntingdon and North Irwin — by 2.4 mills, to 82.4 mills. The 18 property owners in the Allegheny County portion of the district — South Versailles and White Oak — would see their property taxes increase by 0.36 mills, to 12.36 mills.

A homeowner with a property at the median assessed value of $22,010 would pay an additional $53 per year in school taxes.

Directors Barb Viola, Bob Perkins and Dennis Rittenhouse said they would support the budget, but Brian Carlton, Darlene Ciocca, Tracey Czajkowski and William Essay said they would oppose it in its current form. Director Donald Rhodes declined to discuss his vote and Ray Kozak was absent from the Monday meeting.

“I can’t vote yes on a budget when we are raising taxes and the kids are getting less,” Czajkowski said. She was pleased, however, the number of study halls for grades seven and eight were replaced by added courses.

Carlton wanted more time to review the budget. He voiced disappoval that an assistant principal’s position was restored this school year.

“There is no low-hanging fruit anymore,” Rittenhouse said, referring to cutting costs. “There are tough decisions to be made … do we cut arts … do we start pay-for-play?”

Superintendent William Kerr, who is retiring at the end of the month, said the “budget has been very tight and very challenging,” but it does not cut programs and retains all teaching positions.

If the board does not pass a balanced budget by June 30, the district would have to shut down, Kerr said. He felt that would be unfair to incoming superintendent, Jeff Taylor, who is currently an assistant superintendent at North Hills.

Cindy Kohlmeyer of North Huntingdon voiced disapprove for an increase in property taxes, which have been raised the past five years.

“It’s very hard to come up with that money. You are taking food off my table,” Kohlmeyer said.

The board meets at the administration building, 281 McMahon Drive, at 7 p.m. Monday.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.