Norwin hires firm to study facilities | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Norwin hires firm to study facilities

Joe Napsha
1964297_web1_Norwin-High-School-building
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Norwin Senior High School building

A Mt. Lebanon engineering and architecture firm will study Norwin school facilities and prioritize what needs to be repaired or replaced and how much it would cost.

The school board hired VEBH Architects to do the comprehensive facilities master plan for $35,800. The plan is to be finished in March and formally presented to the school board in April.

The “comprehensive blueprint” will help the district determine the use of the facilities, as well as possible options for maintaining them, said Jeff Taylor, Norwin superintendent.

The master plan is to include how Norwin can save on energy use and outline the options for the pool and sports venues. VEBH is directed to study improvements to school safety, the need to replace school desks and any needed repairs to the high school roof. VEBH is to prepare conceptual planning for any reconstruction, repair or new construction.

The plan, which will assess the capacities of the schools, also will include a demographic study to determine how to plan for enrollment, which has been growing in recent years, Taylor said.

Any repairs or projects that are needed will be paid for from the proceeds of a $9.95 million bond issue Norwin approved.

VEBH and McKissick Associates of Harrisburg were the finalists that were interviewed last month for the project. VEBH has created master plans at school districts such as Hopewell Area, North Allegheny, Franklin Regional and Fox Chapel Area.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.