Norwin OKs new stadium turf, despite opposition |

Norwin OKs new stadium turf, despite opposition

Joe Napsha

Norwin officials have agreed to spend more than half a million dollars on artificial turf at two high school fields, a move opponents wanted to delay until the cost of swimming pool repairs is known.

The Norwin School Board on Monday awarded a $587,174 contract to Shaw Sports Turf to replace the artificial turf on the Knights Stadium athletic field, at a cost of about $486,000, and to install artificial turf on the infield of the girls softball field. The contract was awarded to the state-approved vendor on a 6-3 vote.

Directors William Essary, Tracy Czajkowski and Darlene Ciocca opposed awarding a contract when the district has yet to learn how much it will cost for repairs at the pool. It was reported a portion of the ceiling above the pool fell.

Czajkowski said she is aware of the need to replace the turf for safety reasons, but said the condition at the pool area also poses safety problems.

Ciocca said she did not see the harm in waiting until the district gets an inspection report from an architect on the condition of the swimming pool. The inspection is taking place this week.

A representative from Shaw Sports Turf said last week the stadium field would be available for use about 45 days after the project begins. The work will include installing a drainage system underneath the turf.

If the artificial turf were not replaced this year, Director Robert Perkins said the district would bear additional costs.

Brandon Rapp, athletic director, has told the board the turf is in such bad shape it’s not suitable for repairing. He said Norwin’s football squad and other teams that use the field would have to play all away games next school year if no action is taken.

Lacrosse, soccer and field hockey teams also use the field, as do physical education classes.

Rapp told the board the district could save about $20,000 because another local school district, Jeannette, is replacing its artificial turf. If Shaw Sports gets another local contract, Norwin could save about $41,000 on the cost of the project, Rapp said.

The board also awarded a $9,875 contract to ATT Sports Inc. of Berlin, N.J., to repaint the existing lines and events markings for the track at Knights Stadium.

The money for the projects will come from the district’s capital projects fund.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.