Norwin to reveal two finalists for superintendent’s post | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Norwin to reveal two finalists for superintendent’s post

Joe Napsha
921666_web1_Norwin-High-School-building

The two finalists competing to be Norwin’s next superintendent will have an opportunity Wednesday to explain what positive impact they would have on the district.

With the public meeting and presentations by the candidates, the board wants to make the hiring process as transparent as possible, said Barbara Viola, board president.

The school board is on schedule to hire a replacement for Superintendent William Kerr in April.

Viola declined to identify the finalists. More than 20 candidates applied for the position, Viola said.

Each candidate will be given 25 minutes to talk about themselves and what they know about Norwin and what positive impact they will have on the school district and the communities it serves: North Huntingdon, Irwin and North Irwin. Another 20 minutes will be set aside for an open period of questions for each candidate.

The meeting with the candidates is by invitation only at the Norwin administration building.

The school district conducted a similar public meeting when Kerr was hired in 2010, Viola said.

Kerr announced in November that he intended to retire at the end of the school year. That gave the district more time to search for a replacement and have the person in place when the new school year starts, Viola said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.