Paper ballot count doesn’t change Westmoreland commissioner election results |

Paper ballot count doesn’t change Westmoreland commissioner election results

Rich Cholodofsky

A count of the handful of paper ballots cast in Tuesday’s election saw Democratic Westmoreland County Commissioner Gina Cerilli slightly extend her lead over colleague Ted Kopas for the third and final seat on the three-member board of commissioners.

Elections bureau officials on Friday recanvassed all absentee ballots cast and tallied seven provisional ballots and 11 submitted by military members. Final results gave Cerilli a 235-vote victory, one more that she appeared to win by on Tuesday over Kopas, the other Democratic incumbent. Cerilli, 33, of Hempfield, received 35,228 votes and Kopas, 46, of Hempfield garnered 34,993 votes

Republican Sean Kertes, 33, of Greensburg, the chief of staff to retiring Commissioner Charles Anderson, was the top vote-getter with 41,379. Biochemist Doug Chew, 49, a Republican from Hempfield, finished second with 40,237 votes.

There are no mandatory recounts for countywide races and Kopas has not indicated if he intends to ask for the totals to be recounted. Kopas did not return a call seeking comment on Friday.

In addition to adding the few paper ballots cast to the final totals, elections bureau officials also confirmed the number of voters who signed in at the polls on Election Day matched the ballots cast on the touch-screen voting machines, said Elections Bureau Director Beth Lechman.

She said the certification process of Tuesday’s results will begin Monday when write-in votes are tallied and winners are officially declared. The county’s election’s board is scheduled to meet Nov. 2o to precertify the results with final certification set for Nov. 27.

Candidates will have until Nov. 27 to petition the courts for a recount, Lechman said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.