Penn Township man gets prison time for ax attack |

Penn Township man gets prison time for ax attack

Rich Cholodofsky

A Penn Township man will serve up to 10 years in prison for attacking his former girlfriend and her boyfriend with an ax last year.

Benson William Perry, 37, pleaded guilty to charges of aggravated assault and burglary in connection with a March 2018 incident in North Irwin.

Police said Perry removed the front door from its hinges and barged into the apartment of Tonia Lucas and Tyler Hope. Perry brandished an ax and hit Hope with the weapon multiple times in the head and hand. Hope said he needed 11 staples to close his head wound. Lucas suffered head and hand wounds, police said.

According to court records, Perry also hit Hope in the head with a porcelain statue before he ran off. Neighbors found Lucas and Hope covered with blood, police said.

Prosecutors dismissed attempted murder and terroristic threats charges against Perry as part of the plea bargain approved this week by Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio. Perry will serve 3-10 years in prison.

In a separate case, the judge ordered Perry to serve a 3-24 month concurrent sentence. Police said Perry barged into the same apartment a month earlier, walked through an unlocked door, went upstairs, tackled Hope and punched him in the face.

In that case, Perry pleaded guilty to terroristic threats; assault and harassment counts were dismissed.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.