Penn Township residents renew pleas for flood relief | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Penn Township residents renew pleas for flood relief

Jacob Tierney
1429677_web1_gtr-ptflooding-122818
Jacob Tierney | Tribune-Review
A drainage culvert on Hyland Drive in Penn Township.

Last week’s torrential rain brought a deluge of requests for flood relief from Penn Township residents.

More than a dozen spoke at a standing-room-only meeting of township commissioners Wednesday.

“Short of building an ark, I’ve got nothing left,” said Melissa Renwick, who lives on Bushy Run Road.

Renwick said she’s spent more than $10,000 on French drains and other flood mitigation measures on her property, to no avail.

Township leaders assured residents that help was on the way.

The township is seeking a $1.7 million state PennVEST loan to pay for flood control projects in the Harrison Park neighborhood and along Hyland Road, two of the hardest-hit areas.

Most of that money, about $1.4 million, would go toward new drainage pipes and a retention pond in the Harrison Park neighborhood.

The remaining $300,000 has been earmarked for Hyland Road, but that project is more complicated, according to township Manager Alex Graziani.

Hyland and adjoining roads flood frequently. Its drainage system was built decades ago, and is no longer up to the task, Graziani said.

“So many of the housing plans built in Penn Township in the ’70s, ’80s, and ’90s drain toward Hyland Road,” he said.

Most of those neighborhoods were built before the township implemented its current stormwater control rules for new developments.

Hyland Road is maintained by PennDOT, not the township. Graziani said the township has requested renovations, but PennDOT has no such plans.

That’s why some township officials want to take the road back. PennDOT has a Highway Transfer “Turnback” Program which allows for the transfer of state-owned roads to local municipalities.

The catch is money.

Gibson-Thomas Engineering, the firm employed by the township, says the road requires repaving and widening in addition to drainage improvements. The firm estimates it will take about $2.2 million to upgrade Hyland , including replacing small stormwater culverts with larger ones.

Township officials want PennDOT to pay for the work.

It’s not unusual for PennDOT to pay for all or part of the maintenance work associated with a transfer, but the expenditure is subject to negotiation.

Those negotiations haven’t started , but this week’s outcry from residents prompted commissioners to take the first step.

The proposal wasn’t on Wednesday’s agenda, but Commissioner Chuck Konkus urged his colleagues to vote immediately authorizing the township staff to pursue the transfer.

“We have a huge elephant in this room that’s been put into our laps,” he said. “And we need to take the first bite.”

The crowd repeatedly shouted “vote!” as commissioners discussed the issue.

The measure passed unanimously.

A final vote will be taken on the terms of the transfer.

Before the vote, residents shared stories of flooded basements, yards turned to swamps, and sheds swept away.

Marcy Johnson recalled a storm that hit on garbage night. The neighborhood’s trash — including dirty diapers, beer bottles and more — was swept into her yard on Concord Drive.

“It was like cleaning up after a party we hadn’t been invited to,” she said.

The first time Michael Scholze’s Nancy Drive home flooded he was told it was the result of a freak, once-in-a-lifetime rainfall. It’s happened several times since then.

“This 100-year storm has turned into a 12-year storm,” he said.

Western Pennsylvania had record rainfall in 2018 and is putting up similar numbers this year, according to the National Weather Service.

Renee Dilucente, who lives on Long Drive, said the township should have acted years ago.

“I don’t know what you expect people to do,” she said. “I can’t sell my property. I can’t use my basement … somebody didn’t do their job.”

Graziani points to steps taken both recently and decades ago to try to mitigate flooding.

“The residents will sit there and tell the commissioners, you don’t listen, you don’t care, you do nothing,” he said. “I think we’re being very aggressive and proactive in addressing our stormwater issues.”

Between 1999 and 2007 the township borrowed more than $2.8 million from the state to pay for flood control projects in Harrison Park and along Hyland Road. Those loans are nearly paid off, freeing up the township to pursue the new PennVEST loan, he said.

New developments in the township are required to permit at most half as much stormwater runoff as the undeveloped land they’re built on.

The township raised real estate taxes by 2 mills last year, budgeting most of that money for flood management.

Earlier this year the township fired its longtime engineering firm The EADS Group because commissioners were unsatisfied with the pace of work on paving and stormwater management projects, Graziani said.

He attributed the flooding problems to record rainfall and a population that has

doubled in 50 years, forcing the township to continually play catch-up, he said.

“A growing community will have growing pains,” he said. “It’s hard to imagine the residents who are so angry at this township saying we’ve done nothing. Nobody’s been kicking any cans around here.”

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.