Penn Township doctor gets 4 years in prison for illegal opioid distribution |

Penn Township doctor gets 4 years in prison for illegal opioid distribution

Paul Peirce

A Westmoreland County physician who was convicted in January by a federal jury of illegally distributing opioids at his practices in West Virginia was sentenced this week to four years in prison.

Dr. Felix Brizuela, Jr., 58, of Penn Township, was found guilty of 15 counts of distribution of controlled substances after a six-day trial in January in U.S. District Court’s Northern District of West Virginia. The jury acquitted Brizuela of anti-kickback charges and six other distribution counts.

The controlled substances illegally distributed by Brizuela included oxycodone, fentanyl and oxymorphone, U.S. Attorney Bill Powell said. The jury found the drugs were distributed without legitimate medical purpose and outside the scope of professional practice in Monongalia County between 2013-15.

Brizuela lives in Harrison City but practiced medicine out of offices in Connellsville, Fayette County, and Morgantown, W.Va., and operated a drug treatment center in Weirton, W.Va. The latter, known as Advance Healthcare Inc., was closed after federal authorities began an investigation into prescription practices involving Brizuela and his partner, Dr. George Naum III.

In April, a federal jury found Naum guilty of one count of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and four counts of aiding and abetting the distribution of controlled substances . Naum is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 15.


Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.