Pittsburgh man sentenced in drug possession case in Westmoreland County | TribLIVE.com

Pittsburgh man sentenced in drug possession case in Westmoreland County

Rich Cholodofsky

A Pittsburgh man was sentenced Monday to serve up to six years in prison for possession of heroin found during an early morning traffic stop last year in Salem.

Nicholas Antonio Miller, 31, of Brookline, pleaded guilty to two felony drug counts and one misdemeanor offense. His vehicle was pulled over by police Sept 12 as he drove along Route 22.

Police found 50 bricks of heroin, or 2,500 small stamp bags of the drug, in the vehicle along with two ounces of fentanyl and a loaded handgun, according to court records.

Police did not disclose the initial reason for the 2:15 a.m. traffic stop.

Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway ordered Miller serve a 2 1/2-to-6 year prison sentence. Miller’s trial had been scheduled to begin next week.

Miller’s two passengers, Samantina Maria Perri, 30, of Crafton, and Joseph J. Baughman, 38, of Green Tree, were charged with conspiracy and manufacture, delivery or possession of illegal drugs with the intent to deliver.

Perri faces an additional charge that she initially gave police a false identity. In addition to the drug charges, Baughman was charged with a firearms offense.

Both are being held at the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $300,000 bonds.

According to court records, Perri and Baughman have challenged the police searches of their homes and of Perri’s telephone following their arrests. The judge has yet to rule on those pretrial motions.

Baughman and Perri’s trials are scheduled to begin in October.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.