Plea deal rejected in Walmart parking lot wreck that injured East Huntingdon store employee |

Plea deal rejected in Walmart parking lot wreck that injured East Huntingdon store employee

Rich Cholodofsky

A Mt. Pleasant woman charged in a with a injuring a woman stacking carts in a Walmart parking lot last year rejected plea bargain deal that would have required her to spend three days in jail.

Ronalee Bailey, 40, through her defense attorney, told a Westmoreland County judge she would not plead guilty to a lesser charge of reckless endangerment.

Bailey was arrested in connection with an incident Dec. 6, in which police said she was under the influence of drugs when she drove her car into a row of shopping carts that struck a store employee working in the parking lot at the East Huntingdon store. Bailey was charged with having methamphetamine and methadone in her system, according to court records. She was charged three counts of DUI, aggravated assault by vehicle and reckless driving. The worker suffered a broken back and nose, police said.

According to police, Bailey was found after the crash asleep with her head slumped over the steering wheel and an 8-year-old girl sitting with her in the front seat.

Bailey denied she was intoxicated or under the influence of drugs when questioned by police.

Assistant Public Defender Donna McClelland said Bailey would not plead guilty to a lesser charge of reckless endangerment. Assistant District Attorney Christina Gongaware said that deal would have required Bailey to serve just 72 hours behind bars.

McClelland said Bailey wanted to review video of the incident before the case is scheduled for trial.

Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway ordered Bailey to return to court in August when a trial date could be set.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.