Police: 2 charged with endangerment after 3 kids have ‘unexplained’ scars, marks | TribLIVE.com

Police: 2 charged with endangerment after 3 kids have ‘unexplained’ scars, marks

Renatta Signorini

A Smithton man and woman were charged with child endangerment Thursday after investigators said three children removed from their home last year had “unexplained scars and marks” on their bodies.

Mel R. Anastasiu, 41, and Jamie Anastasiu, 39, each are charged with a felony.

Mel Anastasiu was arrested in August after police said he left two toddlers at his Third Street home alone. He shared security footage from his home with state police that showed the two children there by themselves while Anastasiu left for 33 minutes, according to court papers.

As a result, authorities removed children, ages 5, 3, and 1 from the home, according to the new complaint. While in foster care, the children showed signs of possible neglect and past physical abuse, troopers said. Authorities weren’t able to get any more details through forensic interviews with the children.

“There were clear signs of what appeared to be physical abuse, but it was unknown what type of abuse was committed against the children,” Trooper Jason Zanolli wrote in the complaint.

Anastasiu was sentenced in January to one year of probation in connection with the August child endangerment charge, according to court records. He was ordered to complete parenting classes.

No court action has been scheduled in the new cases. Neither suspect had an attorney listed in online court records. They could not be reached.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.