Police: 23rd victim reports giving money to Derry Township constable | TribLIVE.com

Police: 23rd victim reports giving money to Derry Township constable

Renatta Signorini
Renatta Signorini | Tribune-Review
Brian William McDowell, 35, is led away from his arraignment Friday, Jan. 18, 2019.

A new theft charge was filed last week against a Derry Township constable who now is accused of pocketing nearly $12,000 from 23 people.

Brian William McDowell, 35, is accused of taking $200 from a neighbor in June and September after McDowell claimed to need money for a shooting competition sponsorship and his insurance, according to court papers released Tuesday.

The victim contacted investigators after seeing news reports about two previously filed theft cases against McDowell. He is set to be arraigned on the new charge Monday at the same time as his preliminary hearing on the other police allegations.

McDowell is accused in three cases of taking money from 23 people between April and December and attempting to get cash from seven more people. Police said McDowell told the victims he needed money for the purported competition, claimed there were warrants for their arrest or unpaid fines and told them he’d “freeze” the system if they paid him, according to court papers.

McDowell said during a hearing last month he was getting substance abuse treatment.

He won a six-year term as constable as a write-in candidate in the November 2015 election to represent Derry Borough’s Ward 4. County voting records show McDowell was elected with one vote.

Westmoreland County courts have been suspended from using McDowell as a constable until the case is resolved.

His attorney was not immediately available.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.