Police: N.Y. woman tried to use fraudulent ID to buy iPhones in Hempfield | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Police: N.Y. woman tried to use fraudulent ID to buy iPhones in Hempfield

Renatta Signorini
1389345_web1_web-handcuffs_dark

A New York woman is behind bars after state police said she tried to use a fraudulent driver’s license and credit card Monday to purchase two iPhones at a Hempfield store.

Raquel M. Martinez, 27, of New York City is charged with access device fraud, identity theft and related offenses.

Troopers were called to a Verizon Wireless store on Route 30 at 3:30 p.m. after employees stalled the $2,300 purchase of two gold iPhone Xs, according to court papers. Police said Martinez used a driver’s license with her picture on it but had identifying information for a 71-year-old Jeannette man and a 23-year-old Lancaster County woman.

Martinez provided a credit card issued to the Lancaster County woman as a second form of identification, police said.

Authorities found Martinez had another fraudulent driver’s license with identifying information for two Pennsylvanians, from Wexford and Reading.

Martinez was lodged in the Westmoreland County Prison on Monday night on $100,000 bail. She did not have an attorney listed in online court records.

A July 16 preliminary hearing is set.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.