ShareThis Page
West Newton man charged with DUI in crash that injured girl, 16 | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

West Newton man charged with DUI in crash that injured girl, 16

Renatta Signorini
1034992_web1_WEB-police-car

A West Newton man faces a preliminary hearing next month on charges he was drunk when he crashed in South Huntingdon Township in January, injuring a 16-year-old girl.

Jamie Alan Smith, 44, is charged with child endangerment, driving under the influence, accidents involving injury by an unlicensed driver and several summary vehicle code violations.

In court papers released this week, state police said they were called to Apples Mills Road on Jan. 12 and found a car that had crashed into a ditch. Police say Smith told them he was driving his daughter home from breakfast and provided incorrect answers to a trooper’s questions about the girl’s age and where he lives, according to court papers.

Smith admitted to having “too much” to drink and he refused field sobriety tests, police said in an affidavit.

A blood test revealed his blood-alcohol content was 0.213% — more than twice the legal limit to drive, which is 0.08%. Smith’s license had been suspended for a past drunken-driving offense, police said.

The girl had to be extricated from the vehicle. She had a broken nose, black eye and facial bruising, police said.

When reached by the Tribune-Review Wednesday, Smith said he “messed up.”

“I feel horrible about it,” he said.

A summons was issued. Smith is set to appear before a judge May 29.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.