Police: Father charged after 2-year-old shoots mom in Derry Township | TribLIVE.com

Police: Father charged after 2-year-old shoots mom in Derry Township

Renatta Signorini

A 2-year-old boy accidentally shot his mother in the leg this month as she tried to take a loaded weapon out of his hands in Derry Township.

On Tuesday, state police charged the father, David Vincent Marghella Jr., 25.

Trooper Steve Limani said the weapon was left unsecured Nov. 1 on a nightstand in the couple’s bedroom on James Street. Marghella was sleeping on the couch and his 24-year-old wife found the boy holding the gun in a hallway, he said.

“She freaks out, goes to grab it off the kid” when the gun discharged, Limani said.

The weapon accidentally fired a bullet into her thigh. She was hospitalized. Marghella was dropping the boy off at a relative’s home when police caught up with him.

Marghella is a former Derry Borough policeman, Limani said. He is charged with reckless endangerment and child endangerment, both misdemeanors.

His attorney could not be reached. Court papers were unavailable because Marghella had not been arraigned. No court action had been scheduled

About 1.7 million children in the country live in a home with an unsecured, loaded gun, according to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute. About one-third of accidental deaths from a shooting could have been prevented with a child-proof safety lock and a loading indicator, according to the U.S. General Accounting Office.

About 14% of firearm-related deaths involving children under 15 are the result of an unintentional shooting, according to the University of Michigan Injury Prevention Center. Safe storage options include cable or trigger locks, a safe and taking the weapon apart.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.