Police: Woman urinated on state agent searching her during Jeannette drug arrest | TribLIVE.com

Police: Woman urinated on state agent searching her during Jeannette drug arrest

Renatta Signorini

A Johnstown woman is charged with aggravated assault after she urinated on an agent from the state attorney general’s office who was searching her Monday at the Jeannette police station, according to court papers.

Ashley Evon Sanders, 33, vomited as she was being placed in a holding cell at the station and three stamp bags of heroin wrapped with a rubber band landed on the floor, police said.

Sanders was arraigned Tuesday and jailed on $50,000 bail.

Agents and Jeannette police pulled over a car Sanders was driving west on Route 30 at 3:30 p.m. because her drivers license is suspended, according to court papers. Investigators found 231 stamp bags of heroin and fentanyl hidden on her passenger, Taylor Forsythe, 18, of Charleroi, and $3,530 in a purse belonging to Sanders. The money was found to be cash used by the state attorney general’s office in a previous drug investigation, police said.

After Sanders vomited and urinated in the holding cell, she was taken to Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital for an evaluation. She told staff there “that she does not do heroin and that she only ate it because she was scared and didn’t know what to do with it,” according to the complaint.

Sanders also is charged with drug possession, contraband and tampering with evidence. Forsythe is charged with drug possession. She is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on $25,000 bail.

Neither suspect had an attorney listed in online court records. Preliminary hearings are set for Oct. 10.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.