Proposed bill would waive Pennsylvania Turnpike tolls for police, first responders |

Proposed bill would waive Pennsylvania Turnpike tolls for police, first responders

Paul Peirce
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Motorists exit and enter the Pennsylvania Turnpike at the Monroeville toll station on Friday, May 3, 2019.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Motorists exit and enter the Pennsylvania Turnpike at the Monroeville toll station on Friday, May 3, 2019.

Robert Stafford, captain of the Greensburg Police Department, admits scratching his head last year after a bill crossed his desk from the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission requesting a toll payment for a city patrol car that entered the Amos K. Hutchinson Bypass during a pursuit.

“They sent a a picture of the patrol car and its license plate. I initially thought what the heck is this?” Stafford said, laughing.

The matter was “resolved” without the city being assessed a fine after police, at the turnpike’s request, forwarded a police incident case number, he said.

“It seemed kind of weird. … Why would a police car rush through the turnpike booth? It’s usually for a chase or responding to an incident or something like that,” Stafford said. “There’s got to be a little trust there.”

Senate Bill 45, authored by state Sen. Kim Ward, a Hempfield Republican, would waive turnpike tolls for emergency vehicles responding to an urgent call as well as those participating in escorts of fallen first responders or armed service members.

The bill passed out of the Senate Transportation Committee, which Ward chairs. It still must pass in both the House and Senate and be signed into law by Gov. Tom Wolf.

Ward wrote the bill after hearing complaints from fire companies statewide located near the turnpike that expressed frustration with access issues and cost.

“Emergency responders are charged each and every time they access any of the turnpike’s toll roads. Police departments are even assessed tolls for their vehicles involved in a pursuit that takes them onto the turnpike,” Ward said. “My legislation would ensure that a toll would not be required for emergency vehicles in lifesaving situations.”

John Weikle, chief of the Lower Swatara Volunteer Fire Department, admitted to speaking with Ward’s office about problems his Dauphin County department has experienced with turnpike charges. His department responds to incidents along the turnpike near Harrisburg.

“First off, I want to emphasize we have a good working relationship with the turnpike. And as long as we provide a turnpike incident number, we’re not charged,” Weikle said.

However, Weikle said, the department has a 2,500-gallon tanker truck that is called to many incidents in which the turnpike is the quickest route, even if the call isn’t related to the turnpike. That truck, with a weight of 85,000 pounds, is assessed a higher toll charge, amounting to “hundreds of dollars each trip.”

“It’s OK to go on the turnpike. But when it’s over, they want us to take the Capital Beltway back to our station, which is about six miles further around and at least a 10 minutes longer drive,” Weikle said.

He added that the department’s vehicles are equipped with E-Z Pass. He also emphasized that the turnpike commission pays the department to respond to some emergencies per piece of equipment, and the turnpike waives fees when the incident number is forwarded.

Ward said the turnpike commission should cut first responders a break.

“This is commonsense legislation that prevents unnecessary costs from being incurred by first responders, especially volunteer fire companies that are already under a serious fiscal strain,” she said.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.