Red Sand public art project represents human trafficking | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Red Sand public art project represents human trafficking

Mary Pickels

Volunteers gathered at Excela Frick Hospital in Mt. Pleasant this week for this year’s final local installation of the Red Sand Project.

Snipping open small bags, they poured the brightly colored sand into sidewalk cracks outside the hospital’s emergency entrance.

The Blackburn Center is sponsoring the public art installation, which raises awareness about human trafficking.

Rebecca Hamel of Penn Borough attended as an officer of the Humanitarian Social Work Club at Westmoreland County Community College, where she is a student.

“Our group was emailed an invitation from an instructor. I see a lot about it (human trafficking),” she said.

Hamel’s husband, Arthur Hamel, and daughter, Abbigail Hudock, 7, also participated.

Earlier installations this month took place at the Westmoreland County Courthouse and Twin Lakes Park extension area, and at Excela Westmoreland Hospital in Greensburg and Excela Latrobe Hospital.

The Westmoreland County Human Trafficking Task Force organized the county effort, asking residents to join in on shining a light on a covert crime.

A sign posted outside the hospital’s emergency room entrance explained the project.

Created by artist Molly Gochman, the project asks volunteers around the world to place red sand in sidewalk cracks. The grains of sand are representative of millions of human trafficking victims who slip through the cracks of society unnoticed.

The Rev. Bob Ellson, pastor of the United Methodist Church in Mt. Pleasant, and his wife, Jill Ellson, along with congregation member Wanda Ohler, knelt on the sidewalk, directing grains of red sand into the cracks.

“Our daughter works for the Blackburn Center,” Jill Ellson said, explaining their knowledge of and interest in the project.

“Jill (Ellson) did a presentation in church on this, and I thought it was a worthwhile thing to do. It really brings (human trafficking) to your attention,” Ohler said.

Karen Evans, Blackburn Center advocacy program manager, said the project was expanded to different sites and on different dates in this third year of participation.

According to the Blackburn Center, human trafficking enslaves on average 21 million people around the world. Victims can be exploited for sex or labor, sometimes both.

Victims sometimes end up jailed or returning to their traffickers.

Those unable to attend or participate can view the installations and post photos to social media with the hashtag #RedSandProjectWestmoreland.

Reports of suspected trafficking can be made to the center by calling 724-836-1122 or 888-832-2272.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, [email protected] or via Twitter .


1712954_web1_gtr-fricksand1-092619
Mary Pickels | Tribune-Review
Volunteers, from left, Wanda Ohler, Jill Elllson and Bob Ellson, pour red sand into sidewalk cracks in front of Excela Frick Hospital on Sept. 25, part of the Red Sand Project to draw attention to human trafficking.
1712954_web1_gtr-fricksand2-092619
Mary Pickels | Tribune-Review
Lisa Yetter, safety services coordinator for Excela Health, carefully fills a sidewalk crack outside Excela Frick Hospital with red sand.
1712954_web1_gtr-fricksand3-092619
Mary Pickels | Tribune-Review
Abbigail Hudock, 7, of Penn Borough, participates in the Red Sand Project at Excela Frick Hospital in Mt. Pleasant on Sept. 25.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.