Review coming for close Westmoreland commissioner race; recount not automatic |

Review coming for close Westmoreland commissioner race; recount not automatic

Rich Cholodofsky
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Democratic county Commissioner Ted Kopas (left) and chief of staff Dante DeCario watch as results come in during his election night campaign party at The Rialto in Greensburg on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2019.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Ted Kopas speaks with guests during a forum for candidates for Westmoreland County Commissioner on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2019, at Westmoreland County Community College.

Results of Tuesday’s Westmoreland County Commissioners election are expected to be officially certified by Nov. 27.

Three-term Democratic incumbent Ted Kopas lost his seat by just 234 votes to fellow incumbent Democrat Gina Cerilli, who came in third in Tuesday’s four-candidate race. Republicans Sean Kertes and Doug Chew secured to the top two board seats to reclaim a GOP majority.

County officials reported that 84,738 ballots were cast in Tuesday’s election, a turnout that reached nearly 36%.

The razor-thin margin between the two Democrats will be subjected to a general recanvassing this week in which elections officials will ensure the vote totals were accurately reported from each touch-screen machine.

That review, conducted after every election, is scheduled Friday and is not considered a recount, said Beth Lechman, director of the county Elections Bureau. It functions as a final unofficial review of the results that will include a first-time counting of about 10 provisional ballots cast Tuesday as well as an estimated 10 military ballots mailed from service members and another 20 absentee ballots that were not included with the initial results.

Candidates and officials from the Democratic and Republican committees can attend the recanvassing, Lechman said.

There is no mandatory provision in the law for a recount of the commissioners race results, she said.

“There are mandatory recounts for state races when the results are less than one-half of one percent. There are no requirements for a recount of county races,” Lechman said.

The margin between Cerilli and Kopas was less than 0.2%.

Kopas has until Nov. 27 to seek an official recount. To do so, he would be required to pay $50 for each voting machine from which he would seek a recount. The county used 801 machines on Election Day, meaning it would cost more than $40,000 to do a complete recount. A potential recount would also include a by-hand tally of all 2,296 absentee ballots submitted, Lechman said.

Kopas did not return calls for comment on Wednesday.

On Tuesday night, Kopas said he was disappointed by the election results “as it stands right now.”

Kertes and Cerilli said, as of late Wednesday morning, they had not heard from Kopas as to whether he would challenge the results or concede the race.

The county’s three-member elections board, which includes two county Common Pleas Court judges and retiring Commissioner Charles Anderson, is tentatively slated to pre-certify Tuesday’s vote tally on Nov. 20.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.