ShareThis Page
Rostraver man loses 3rd appeal of life sentence for murder | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Rostraver man loses 3rd appeal of life sentence for murder

Rich Cholodofsky
822509_web1_gtr-billyrayboggs-102418
Submitted
Billy Ray Boggs Jr.

A Westmoreland County judge on Friday rejected the appeal of a Rostraver man serving a life prison term for the 2015 murder of his sister’s boyfriend.

Billy Ray Boggs Jr., 52, has, for the last three years, sought to withdraw his guilty plea to a count of first-degree murder for the stabbing and beating death of Thomas Guercio. Police said Boggs beat Guercio, 35, in the head with a hammer and then stabbed him in the chest. A day later, he dumped the body down a hillside near Kittanning, Armstrong County.

Boggs pleaded guilty in September 2015 and now contends he was coerced to do so by the district attorney and his own defense attorneys. Boggs served as his own lawyer in his latest appeal hearing before Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway.

Boggs also claimed he suffered from a mental illness that clouded his ability to voluntarily plead guilty.

The judge, in a 14-page opinion filed Friday, denied Boggs’ appeal.

In that ruling, Hathaway said there was no evidence to support Boggs’ contention that he was coerced to plead guilty and that she heard no testimony that he suffered from any mental illness that would have prevented him from understanding the ramifications of his plea.

“Based on defendant’s own statements at this guilty plea hearing … it is abundantly clear that the defendant was clear-headed and coherent at the time he pled guilty to first-degree murder,” Hathaway wrote.

Boggs now has lost three separate appeals of his conviction and sentence.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.