Route 981 detour ahead as PennDOT plans to replace Latrobe bridge | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Route 981 detour ahead as PennDOT plans to replace Latrobe bridge

Jeff Himler
1354300_web1_gtr-UnityRunBridge-063019
Jeff Himler | Tribune-Review
Two-way traffic passes through narrow 11-foot lanes on Latrobe’s Lloyd Avenue on Friday, June 28, 2019, as a PennDOT contractor prepares to replace a bridge with a box culvert.

A section of Route 981 in Latrobe will be closed for a few days, beginning July 12, so crews can remove a bridge over Unity Run and replace it with a box culvert deck.

Route 981 (Lloyd Avenue) will be closed to traffic between Wimmerton Industrial Park and Linden Street. A marked 9-mile detour will direct motorists along routes 30 and 982 and Industrial Boulevard.

Most motorists don’t realize they’re crossing the bridge since it’s hidden from view and the stream passes through underground culverts on either side of the street. The bridge is located just south of the Latrobe Fire Department’s Hose House 6 and is between the intersections of River Avenue and Mary Street.

July 15 is the tentative completion date for the work, which is part of a $1.1 million PennDOT project being constructed by CH&D Enterprises.

In the weeks leading up to the bridge replacement, two-way traffic has been maintained on Route 981. Vehicles have been squeezed into two shifted lanes, each 11 feet wide.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.