Rustic Ridge Mine seeks to hire, move toward full production | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Rustic Ridge Mine seeks to hire, move toward full production

Joe Napsha
1088364_web1_gtr-RusticRidgemine-050519
Mountain Watershed Association
Rustic Ridge Mine entrance

A Cambria County mining company has put out a “help wanted” sign for its Rustic Ridge Mine that lies underneath parts of the Donegal area.

LCT Energy LP of Armagh is seeking to increase employment at Rustic Ridge Mine from 37 to about 100 miners as it moves toward full production, said Gil Widenhofer, a vice president for Robindale Energy Services & Associated Companies in Latrobe. The employment level at the mine depends on the demand for the metallurgical coal mined there.

LCT Energy LP, one of the Robindale companies, wants to hire both experienced and inexperienced underground miners for jobs as mechanics, electricians, foremen, mine examiners and operators, roof bolters and scoop operators.

Non-experienced miners will undergo a training program, Widenhofer said.

The mine’s slope has been developed, providing access to the coal that is underneath Donegal Township in Westmoreland County and Saltlick Township in Fayette County. LCT Energy is developing the area at the bottom of the slope, which includes mining the coal, Widenhofer said.

“We will continue to increase production over the next several months,” Widenhofer said.

When the company applied a few years ago for operating permits from the state, it said it wanted to extract millions of tons of coal over a 15- to 20-year period.

It projected mining more than 2,900 acres in that area that contains about 18 million tons of metallurgical coal.

LCT Energy says on its website that it produces 850,000 tons of coal annually from two Somerset County mines — Cass and Maple Springs — with about 80 employees. It describes Rustic Ridge as a world class project holding metallurgical coal that is burnt in coke ovens to remove impurities and then used to produce steel.

Before the start of production, LCT Energy officials had said the company would invest $50 million to develop the mine.

With employment expected to hit 120 jobs, the mine was projected to pump $200 million into the area’s economy.

Environmental concerns

A local environmental organization, the Mountain Watershed Association in Melcroft, has opposed the mine development, fearful of the impact on property values and air pollution.

Before a state environmental hearing in January 2018, the association reached an agreement with LCT Energy that would expand the distance between the old Melcoft mine and Rustic Ridge mining activities from 800 feet to 1,400 feet, as well as install a meter to detect any changes that would protect the watershed from unwanted discharges into the watershed.

The organization also got LCT Energy to reduce the amount of outflow it was permitted by the state to dump into Champion Creek. The Mountain Watershed group was concerned the amount of water discharged into the stream might overwhelm it and the watershed.

Mountain Watershed President Beverly Braverman could not be reached for comment.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.