Salaries set for North Huntingdon officials |

Salaries set for North Huntingdon officials

Joe Napsha

North Huntingdon’s top administrators will receive salary increases ranging from 2 to 7 percent this year.

Police Chief Robert Rizzo, who was promoted to the position of chief in September, will receive an annual salary of $121,179 in 2019, an increase from the 2018 pro-rated salary of $118,750. Rizzo was a sergeant and the acting officer in charge of the department since June 2018, following the retirement of Lt. Rod Mahinske. Rizzo’s salary includes longevity pay for his 28 years of service on the force.

Manager Jeff Silka, in his second year in the position, will receive a salary of $114,440, up from $110,000. Assistant Manager Michael Turley will see his salary increase to $89,674, up from $83,432.

Other salary changes include: Andrew Blenko, township planning director, $111,856, up from $109,695; Richard Albert, public works director, $81,282, an increase from $80,262; Daniel Miller, parks and recreation department director, $70,554, an increase from $69,498.

Township commissioners approved the salary increases in December.

Employees covered under the township’s contract with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which consists of the employees working in the public works department, clerical workers and police dispatchers, will receive an average raise of 3 percent.

Township police officers will receive a 2.5 percent wage increase under an arbitration award.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.