Saltsburg man accused of heroin possession after traffic stop in Delmont | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Saltsburg man accused of heroin possession after traffic stop in Delmont

Paul Peirce
1339285_web1_web-heroin

A traffic stop in Delmont on June 6 resulted in the arrest of an Indiana County man on charges of heroin possession.

Austin T. Hopkins, 23, of Saltsburg was charged by borough officer Jacob Cholock with possession of heroin and possession of drug paraphernalia before Export District Judge Charles Conway.

Cholock reported in court documents that he was on patrol about 10:30 p.m. when he saw a black Kia sedan turn from Stotler Drive on to Route 66 without using a turn signal. Cholock also said the vehicle quickly accelerated onto the highway traveling 58 mph in a 45 mph zone.

Cholock stopped the car and reported that Hopkins, who was a passenger, was acting nervously. During a consensual search, Cholock said he discovered multiple stamp bags of heroin tucked inside the “waist area” of Hopkins’ pants.

About 30 stamp bags of heroin marked “Chucky,” “Taken,” and “Red Alert” were confiscated, Cholock said. A bundle of heroin is 15 stamp bags.

Hopkins was charged by Conway’s office via mailed summons. A preliminary hearing is Aug. 6.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.