Second woman accuses Diocese of Greensburg priest of abuse |

Second woman accuses Diocese of Greensburg priest of abuse

Stephen Huba
Diocese of Greensburg
Monsignor Michael Matusak.

A second woman has come forward to accuse Monsignor Michael Matusak of sexual abuse, her attorney said.

The woman said she was abused from 1973 to 1976 while Matusak was a deacon at St. Hedwig Parish, Smock, and after his ordination to the priesthood, said her attorney, Adam Horowitz of Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

“The woman also says that Matusak stalked and harassed her for nearly 20 more years, even telling her that he would leave the priesthood for her,” Horowitz said in a statement.

The Diocese of Greensburg learned of the second accusation against Matusak in March and reported it to PA ChildLine and law enforcement, diocesan spokesman Jerry Zufelt said.

At the time, Matusak was already under suspension for an allegation first reported to the diocese in August 2018.

The original allegation stemmed from Matusak’s time at St. Pius X Parish, Mt. Pleasant (1997-2008). Following the release of a statewide grand jury report in August, a woman who had been a parishioner at St. Pius X emailed the diocese to say Matusak molested her when she was a teenager.

The diocese, deeming the allegation credible, placed Matusak on leave and referred the matter to Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck. That investigation is ongoing.

Matusak has since retired to the priests’ retirement facility in Greensburg.

Horowitz criticized the diocese for not making the second allegation public as it did with the first one.

“This is another example of America’s bishops failing at their promises of transparency and openness — and the importance of the public and the media in holding them accountable. Public safety depends upon it and survivors deserve better,” he said.

Zufelt said in a case where an investigation is pending, such as with Matusak, the diocese’s policy is to defer “all further public release of information to law enforcement … in order not to impede a criminal investigation.”

“It is important to note that at the time of this second allegation, Monsignor Matusak was already removed from public ministry. Monsignor Matusak may have retired, but the law enforcement investigation continues,” he said.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.