Sen. Kim Ward seeks online feedback about possible fireworks restrictions |

Sen. Kim Ward seeks online feedback about possible fireworks restrictions

Renatta Signorini

State Sen. Kim Ward wants input from constituents on possible restrictions for when fireworks can be set off.

It’s the latest series of questions in the Hempfield Republican’s online legislative survey, a feature she started on her website in March.

Ward first sought responses through survey questions asking what Westmoreland County residents thought about Sunday hunting and the legalization of recreational marijuana.

The current survey questions ask whether constituents support legislative moves related to fireworks:

• Do you support banning the use of fireworks between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m., except for holidays and if allowed by municipalities for special events and occasions?

• Do you support prohibiting the use of fireworks Monday through Thursday, except for holidays and if allowed by municipalities for special events and occasions?

The online questionnaire is a way to reach local people outside of the Capitol’s walls, Ward has said. Anyone can answer the questions, but respondents are asked to provide residency information so Ward can look at constituents’ answers.

The survey can be found at Answers will be accepted until Aug. 10.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.