Seton Hill students recognized for diplomacy skills at Model UN Conference |

Seton Hill students recognized for diplomacy skills at Model UN Conference

Stephen Huba
Seton Hill University
Seton Hill University students (from left) Mark Nealon, Paris Szalla, Gina Scarselatto, Brianna Franzino, Ariana Scott, William Weber, Carrie Ellis and Scott Woodstuff at the Model UN Conference.

A team of eight Seton Hill University students was recognized for its work at the recent Model United Nations Conference in New York City.

The team received an Honorable Mention Delegation Award for representing the West African country of Mauritania at the conference, while sophomore political science major Paris Szalla received the Outstanding Position Paper in Committee award for a paper on expanding electricity grids in development countries.

The conference, held each spring at the UN headquarters in New York, is a four-day simulation of the UN committee system.

“The Model United Nations Conference allows students the ability to practice their negotiation, speaking, and writing skills with a group of up to 5,000 peers from universities across the world,” said Roni Kay O’Dell, Seton Hill assistant professor of political science and global studies.

The Seton Hill team included Szalla, of Pittsburgh; Carrie Ellis, a junior political science and global studies major from Ligonier; Brianna Franzino, a freshman global studies major from Greensburg; Mark Nealon, a sophomore political science major from Dunmore; Ariana Scott, a freshman political science and sociology major from Leechburg; Gina Scarsellato, a senior sociology major from Canonsburg; William Weber, a senior political science major from Elizabeth; and Scott Woodstuff, a sophomore political science major from McMurray.

The honorable mention was for excellence in negotiation and diplomacy skills.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.