Several Westmoreland County school districts replacing artificial turf |

Several Westmoreland County school districts replacing artificial turf

Joe Napsha
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Norwin will spend $587,000 for the resurfacing project — $486,000 to replace the turf at Knight Stadium and about $101,000 to install artificial turf on the infield of the girls softball field.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
A tractor removes former turf to be loaded into trucks at Norwin Senior High School on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 as the old turf was removed in preparation to install a new playing field.
Shane Dunlap | Tribune-Review
Workers load rolls of the former field turf onto flatbed trucks for transport at Norwin Senior High School on Wednesday, June 12, 2019 as the old turf was removed in preparation to install a new playing field.
photos: Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Penn-Trafford Warriors stadium, after the artificial turf was removed last week.
Greensburg Salem’s Offutt Field and Penn-Trafford Warriors Stadium were stripped of turf.

The turf’s up at four Westmoreland County school districts — Franklin Regional, Greensburg Salem, Norwin and Penn-Trafford — and being installed at Jeannette.

Shaw Sports Turf of Calhoun, Ga., has removed artificial turf from stadiums at Norwin, Greensburg Salem and Penn-Trafford and will have the fields ready by the time teams begin practicing in August, school officials said.

The turf, which was cut up and rolled into bundles, will be recycled at Playing Surface Solutions in Meadville, said Ray Battistel, a Western Pennsylvania representative for Shaw Sports.

Norwin will spend $587,000 for the project — $486,000 to replace the turf at Knight Stadium and about $101,000 to install artificial turf on the infield of the girls softball field.

Brandon Rapp, Norwin’s athletic director, told the school board in April the turf was unsafe and if not replaced, the football, field hockey, soccer and lacrosse teams would be unable to play at home. The field also is used by the school’s physical education classes.

Norwin replaced the turf about eight years ago, but the wear and tear on the artificial turf had created problems, Rapp said.

Three board members opposed spending money on the field until the district learned how much it would cost to make necessary repairs to the high school swimming pool. That cost has yet to be determined.

The turf at Greensburg Salem’s Offutt Field was used for 12 years. Its normal lifespan is 10 years, said Mike Burrell, Greensburg Salem’s athletic director.

“It was time for it to be replaced. We got our money’s worth, plus two,” Burrell said.

The turf replacement under way at Offutt Field will cost about $315,522, according to James Meyer, Greensburg Salem business manager.

It will be paid in part with a $150,000 grant from the Pittsburgh Steelers through the NFL Foundation’s Grassroots Program. The remainder will come from the district’s capital fund.

Greensburg Salem anticipates the turf will be laid down in July and the field will be available for use by Aug. 1.

Franklin Regional will pay $1.2 million to resurface the football field and track as part of an overall $1.78 million capital improvements plan. It has not been replaced since 2009.

The turf at Penn-Trafford’s Warriors Stadium will be replaced at a cost of $433,290.

While the turf was nine years old and could have made it through another school year, Scott Inglese, assistant superintendent, said Penn-Trafford received a discount from Shaw because Norwin and Jeannette were installing new turf. It made it cost-effective for Penn Trafford to replace the turf this year.

Jeannette opted for artificial turf at McKee Stadium because the grass field was “proving to be unreliable for stability and had become rutted and pitted,” Superintendent Matthew Jones said.

“The surface was still nearly unplayable by the end of the season for most sports,” even when the school district limited the use of the grass field and rented fields at other locations, Jones said.

The district’s athletic trainer from Excela Health in Greensburg determined most injuries on the field during the past few years were “of a variety consistent with an unstable playing surface,” Jones said.

Costs played a factor in opting to pay $728,000 for the artificial turf, Jones said. Jeannette, Norwin and Penn-Trafford were able to save more than $40,000 on the project because of all three districts using Shaw Sports Turf, Jones said.

Jeannette was paying about $40,000 annually to maintain a natural surface that needed to be re-sodded for use this fall, Jones said.

“We can create greater facility access for our Jeannette community youth clubs and organizations such as midget football and youth soccer” with the artificial turf field and resurfaced track, Jones said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.