Smithton man accused of assaulting Westmoreland prison guard |

Smithton man accused of assaulting Westmoreland prison guard

Paul Peirce

An 18-year-old Smithton man was charged Thursday for allegedly assaulting a Westmoreland County Prison guard as he was being strip-searched following his arrest Oct. 7.

Timothy D. Ingram was arraigned on charges of aggravated assault and simple assault filed by county detectives. He was remanded to the county prison after failing to post $50,000 bail set by Hempfield District Judge Mark Mansour.

Detective James Williams reported in an affidavit of probable cause that Ingram was arrested last fall for child endangerment, simple assault and harassment by state police in Belle Vernon after allegedly striking a 4-year-old with a belt.

Williams reported in court documents that guards said Ingram became agitated and threw his clothes into the face of a prison guard when he was being processed into the Hempfield lockup.

When the guard attempted to secure the inmate, “Ingram punched the guard in the face,” Williams wrote.

The guard required medical attention for a cut lip and an injured right hand, according to police reports.

Ingram is awaiting trial in the Oct. 7 case. Mansour scheduled a March 3 preliminary hearing on the case involving the prison guard.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.