Some hesitation, but local leaders see benefit of Penn Township turnpike interchange |

Some hesitation, but local leaders see benefit of Penn Township turnpike interchange

Jacob Tierney
Jason Cato | Tribune-Review
Vehicles travel along Route 130 near the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Penn Township on Wednesday, July 1, 2019.
Jason Cato | Tribune-Review
Vehicles travel along Route 130 in Penn Township as traffic on the Pennsylvania Turnpike passes below on Wednesday, July 17, 2019.

Mary Etta Bertolino has lived on Route 130 in Penn Township since the 1950s, when it was a sleepy rural road.

“It was like the boondocks out there,” she said.

It’s changed a lot since then. Cars constantly zip by on the busy road. Construction equipment across the street heralds commercial development. And soon, there might be a turnpike interchange just up the street from her house.

The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission has added cashless turnpike ramps in Penn Township to its 10-year plan, leaving local residents and officials considering the potential impacts.

Bertolino is happy to hear about it. At 89, she said she doesn’t expect to be around when the project is finished, but she hopes it will drive up property values so she can sell her home and leave the money to her family.

The proposed turnpike entrance and exit in the western portion of the county would fall between existing interchanges. It would be about 6 miles from the Monroeville interchange in Alle­gheny County and 4 miles from the existing Irwin interchange farther east in Westmoreland County.

Vital for development

For state Rep. George Dunbar, R-Penn Township, the commission’s decision is a long time coming.

“It’s something I’ve advocated for for over a decade,” he said. “It’s nice to finally see something concrete happening on the 10-year plan.”

Dunbar served as a township commissioner before being elected to the House of Representatives in 2010.

He, like other advocates of the project, believes connecting the township to the turnpike will be vital for sparking development while making life easier for many township residents who commute to Pittsburgh.

Township Manager Alex Graziani said he’s “thrilled” with the commission’s decision.

He credits the work done by Dunbar and state Sen. Kim Ward, R-Hempfield, chairwoman of the Senate transportation committee, to bring a long-discussed idea one step closer to reality.

He also thanked the communities around Penn Township, all of which passed resolutions over the past year calling for the interchange. Those include North Huntingdon, Trafford, Irwin, Murrysville, Manor and Jeannette.

“Obviously, it’s a major milestone. The township has never been this close,” he said.

Traffic impact

Jeff Shula, president of the township Board of Commissioners, isn’t ready to celebrate. He said he doesn’t want to voice an opinion about the project until its consequences are better understood.

“I don’t know what impact it will have if it goes through,” he said.

One concern is traffic. A 2017 feasibility study by the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission found an extra 8,000 cars a day would travel on Route 130 to get to the turnpike ramps. That stretch of Route 130 now sees about 12,000 vehicles a day, according to PennDOT figures.

The study found it would cost about $38 million to widen Route 130 to accommodate the extra traffic, in addition to the $30 million required to build the ramps.

More traffic could mean more customers for local businesses, said Crystal Urban, who owns JCB Corner Store near the proposed interchange.

“I think it’s a good idea,” she said. “I don’t think it will hurt us, and it might bring more business.”

Though the interchange is now officially in the turnpike commission’s plan, there’s a lot that needs to happen before it is a sure thing.

The turnpike commission, PennDOT, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission and local leaders will need to work together to establish a timetable, design the ramps, improve Route 130 and scrounge up the funding to pay for it all.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.