Thousands of Westmoreland case files to be digitized | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Thousands of Westmoreland case files to be digitized

Renatta Signorini
1417454_web1_gtr-downtownGreensburg-112818
Tribune-Review file
Westmoreland County Courthouse as seen from the roof of the First Commonwealth Building in downtown Greensburg.

Thousands of decades-old criminal case files at the Westmoreland County Clerk of Courts office soon will be available electronically.

County commissioners this month approved a proposal from Ford Business Machines Inc. to scan and index 6,000 files by Aug. 31. Clerk Bryan Kline expects that to equal about 360,000 images at a cost of $35,000.

Files opened between 1980-83 will be the latest target of an ongoing initiative to digitize files in the office. Kline said the costs will be paid through a records improvement fund, which contains money from filing fees collected in the Recorder of Deeds office.

Case files for several years, mainly in the 1980s, already have been digitized.

“It makes it easier for staff and court personnel to just sit down at a computer and look at that image,” he said.

Otherwise, a specific case file would have to be requested and then leafed through to find the right document.

“This is 2019 and I think this information should be at the access of fingertips,” Kline said.

Westmoreland County Clerk of Courts office dockets about 6,500 criminal cases a year.

Clean slate

The work to digitize old criminal case files for use in the clerk’s office comes as Pennsylvania court officials have started scrubbing tens of millions of old, nonviolent criminal charges from the public docket as part of the state’s new Clean Slate law.

Being removed from public view are certain non-violent misdemeanors and summary convictions as well as cases that did not result in convictions.

The General Assembly last summer passed the Clean Slate law — the first of its kind in the country — that requires courts to seal nonviolent misdemeanor records after 10 years, provided the individual had no further brushes with the law, and to automatically seal records of summary offenses and charges that did not result in a criminal conviction.

About 40 million offenses on 30 million cases are expected to be removed from the public docket by year end, according to the Administrative Office of the Pennsylvania Courts, or AOPC.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.