Union group to air Medicare for All video | TribLIVE.com

Union group to air Medicare for All video

Joe Napsha

A 23-minute video that makes the case for Medicare for everyone will be aired at 7 p.m. March 18 at the Greater Westmoreland County Labor Council meeting at Hempfield No. 2 Fire Department, Thornton Road.

A panel discussion will follow the video with labor activists from the Western Pennsylvania Coalition for Single Payer Healthcare and doctors from the Pittsburgh chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program.

The video is geared to help union members understand how the proposed Medicare for All Act, which was introduced in the House of Representatives in February, would provide comprehensive health care coverage for all U.S. residents, without co-pays, deductibles or premiums. The video includes interviews with U.S. and Canadian trade unionists and doctors from the physicians group.

If the nation were to enact the Medicare for All as a national health insurance program, it would take health care “off the table” during contract negotiations and workers would no longer lose their health insurance coverage if they are on strike, locked out or unemployed, according to Harriet Ellenberger, secretary of the Greater Westmoreland Labor Council.

As written, the bill would prevent employers from offering private insurance. A George Mason University study estimated the cost of providing Medicare for all Americans would cost about $32 trillion over 10 years.

For more information, contact Ellenberger at 724-423-2878.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.