Unity woman’s fraud trial delayed while son, co-defendant remains in federal custody | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Unity woman’s fraud trial delayed while son, co-defendant remains in federal custody

Rich Cholodofsky
1655574_web1_gtr-stankomom1-121218
1655574_web1_gtr-stanko-041418

The criminal fraud trial of an elderly Unity woman will be delayed because her son and co-defendant remains in federal custody on unrelated offenses.

Almira Stanko, 83, is awaiting trial in Westmoreland County on three felony counts, including conspiracy and fraud, in connection with allegations she attempted to use her son’s government benefits account while he is jail awaiting trial on pending gun charges.

County prosecutors, in court documents filed Tuesday, said federal authorities have refused to transport Thomas Stanko from the Mahoning County Jail in Youngstown, Ohio.

In December, Thomas Stanko was indicted on two counts of illegally possessing 17 firearms and ammunition despite multiple criminal convictions dating back to 1989. Similar charges filed against him by local authorities had previously been dismissed following a preliminary hearing April 2018. At that time, District Judge Michael Mahady ruled there was insufficient evidence to prove Thomas Stanko owned 28 weapons confiscated at his home during a property search.

State police in December charged Thomas Stanko with the same fraud offenses as his mother. Prosecutors consolidated both cases so they will be tried together.

In June, Common Pleas Court President Judge Rita Hathaway ordered Thomas Stanko be transported by U.S. marshals to attend his preliminary hearing in the fraud case.

Thomas Stanko, because of the federal government’s refusal to transport him back to Westmoreland County, is still awaiting a preliminary hearing in the fraud case. His mother’s case was scheduled for trial this week before Common Pleas Court Judge Megan Bilik-DeFazio.

According to court documents, defense attorney Allen Roth said Almira Stanko, who has been free on a nominal bond, agreed to her trial’s delay.

Thomas Stanko has been in state and federal custody since April 2018, after initially being named a suspect in the disappearance of his former girlfriend, Cassandra Gross. Investigators have said they believe Gross, who was last seen earlier that month, is dead. Numerous searches in and around Unity, including Thomas Stanko’s home and property owned by his mother, have been unsuccessful in locating Gross. Thomas Stanko has repeatedly denied any involvement in Gross’ disappearance.

As those searches continued, Thomas Stanko was charged by local police with possessing a stolen all-terrain vehicle, re-sentenced to serve up to four years in prison for violating probation on a prior assault conviction from 2015 and is awaiting trial for another case in which he was charged with assaulting a man in a local bar.

In the fraud case, police contend Thomas Stanko allegedly told his mother how to access his $1,200 account, providing her his PIN number during a late October recorded phone call from the Westmoreland County Prison. State police troopers allege Almira Stanko tried to make a $9.22 purchase at the Giant Eagle in Ligonier on Oct. 30 that was denied.

In a second recorded conversation later that day, Almira Stanko reported the rejected purchase to her son, police said. Authorities seized Thomas Stanko’s ACCESS card and the Giant Eagle receipt from her home near Unity Cemetery.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.