USDA to fund flood control efforts in North Huntingdon, Scottdale | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

USDA to fund flood control efforts in North Huntingdon, Scottdale

Jacob Tierney
1829314_web1_gtr-floodadvisoryJT2-071219
Jacob Tierney | Tribune-Review
Workers begin repairs of a sinkhole that opened beneath the playground outside North Huntingdon KinderCare preschool Thurdsay, July 11, 2019.

Westmoreland County will receive a cut of $1.9 million in federal funds to help prevent flooding, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.

The USDA will spend the money to develop watershed project plans and conduct feasibility studies in Lancaster, Chester, Westmoreland and Wyoming Counties.

In Westmoreland County, officials will work to stem flooding from Jacob’s Creek and the connected streams in Scottdale and East Huntingdon.

The region has struggled with frequent flooding over the last several years because of heavier-than average rain.

July flooding caused a sinkhole outside a North Huntingdon daycare center, forcing its evacuation.

North Huntingdon residents have repeatedly gone to officials with the township and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers asking for solutions to the frequent flooding.

More than $150 million from the USDA will be spent on similar projects nationwide.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.