Veterans Leadership Program earns state nonprofit association’s ‘Seal of Excellence’ |

Veterans Leadership Program earns state nonprofit association’s ‘Seal of Excellence’

Patrick Varine
Tribune-Review file

Pittsburgh-based Veterans Leadership Program is the first veteran service organization in the state to receive the Pennsylvania Association of Nonprofit Organization’s Seal of Excellence.

“Participating in this program and subjecting our organization to the independent review demonstrates the organization’s commitment to excellence not only to the Veterans we serve, but also to our partners, stakeholders, funders and donors. It lets the community know that we take our responsibilities seriously,” said Dr. Marcel Minutolo, chair of the VLP Board of Directors and Army veteran.

VLP received the designation after completing the basic standard requirements of the association’s “Standards for Excellence” program.

Association staff evaluated VLP throughout 2018, looking at values such as honesty, integrity, fairness, respect, trust, responsibility and accountability.

VLP’s CEO, Navy veteran Dr. Ben Stahl, encouraged other veteran-service nonprofits to consider being evaluated for the association’s program.

“As veteran-serving nonprofit organizations, we must honor our connection with our military heritage by operating as efficiently, effectively, ethically and transparently as possible, (and) the Standards for Excellence objectively measure and validate those vital signs,” Stahl said.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.