Wanted: New place for Irwin fire whistle | TribLIVE.com

Wanted: New place for Irwin fire whistle

Joe Napsha
Irwin fire department siren sits atop roof of borough building on Main Street. Irwin fire siren atop roof of borough building on Main Street.

Wanted: Home in Irwin for a fire whistle. Must be atop a high building and cause minimal disruption to neighbors when it sounds in the middle of the night.

Irwin officials are trying to figure out what to do with the fire department’s whistle, which is mounted on the roof of the borough building on Main Street. Water is leaking around its base and has permeated borough offices and the police evidence room, said Valerie Morton, borough manager.

Officials estimate it would cost about $7,500 to remove the whistle and seal the holes.

Although the roof is leaking, Chief Justin Mochar told council recently that he did not believe the solution would be to move the whistle to the roof of the fire hall, which is essentially a one-story building.

“Somebody will be annoyed wherever you put it,” Mochar said.

Because of the way the whistle and its metal frame is constructed, it would not be feasible to put it on a utility pole, Mochar said.

The fire chief said he believes it would be costly to move the whistle, possibly between $60,000 and $70,000.

Mochar said he was not certain how the fire siren, which served as the Civil Defense alert system, is activated by the Westmoreland County Department of Public Safety.

Roland “Buddy” Mertz, director of the county public safety department, could not be reached for comment.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.