Wanted: Somebody to run for North Irwin council | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Wanted: Somebody to run for North Irwin council

Joe Napsha
1867317_web1_gtr-NIcouncil-110119

Does anyone in tiny North Irwin want to run for a seat on borough council in the Nov. 5 election?

If they want to mount a write-in campaign, a seat is there for the taking. In fact, three of the seven seats on council are open, according to the election ballot the borough’s voters will see next Tuesday.

No one in the town of about 840 people ran for any of three vacancies on council in the primary and no one gathered signatures to have their name placed on the ballot in the general election.

The terms of concilmen Ronald Brown, Terry Hill and John Lapinsky expire this year and none of them wanted to serve on council for a four-year term. Brown was appointed to fill a vacancy and Hill and Lapinski.

Earl H. Kiser Jr. and Amy Blake both won seats on council in the November 2015 general election, but neither still are serving on the governing body.

No one has placed campaign signs in town asking voters to write-in their names for borough council, said Lisa Gesler, the borough’s secretary-treasurer.

Mayor John McIntyre could not be reached for comment.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Norwin | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.