Warrants, other documents remain sealed in Cassandra Gross disappearance, judge rules | TribLIVE.com

Warrants, other documents remain sealed in Cassandra Gross disappearance, judge rules

Rich Cholodofsky

A Westmoreland County judge has continued to keep private details of an ongoing investigation into the disappearance of a Unity woman who police said was likely killed last year.

Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger signed court orders on Sept. 19 that sealed for another 30 days search warrants and corresponding documentation obtained over the last year in connection with disappearance of Cassandra Gross.

The judge’s order said that in the interest of justice the search warrants will remain private as “it further appearing that the release of investigative details within could jeopardize an ongoing investigation ….”

Krieger’s ruling came without a hearing. The judge conducted a hearing behind closed doors in August in which he heard arguments from prosecutors as to why the search documents should remain private. Following that hearing, the judge ruled the search warrants would remain sealed for an additional 30 days.

Gross, who would have turned 53 this year, was last seen in April 2018. In January, a county judge declared her legally dead. Her family members contend she was likely killed. State police investigators said they are treating her disappearance as a homicide.

Police searches in and around her Unity home and property owned by her former boyfriend have not resulted in finding Gross’ remains.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.