ShareThis Page
Westmoreland Conservation District will host Q&A sessions Tuesday, Wednesday | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Westmoreland Conservation District will host Q&A sessions Tuesday, Wednesday

Patrick Varine
| Friday, February 15, 2019 5:40 p.m
746119_web1_gtr-flood-091118
Tribune-Review
Maintenance worker Jacob Moyer of the Greensburg Parks & Recreation Department monitors the rising water at the at the Thomas Lynch Field Complex on Sept. 25, 2018. The heavy rain was the result of the remnants of Tropical Storm Gordon.
746119_web1_gtr-WaterPlanQnA2-021719
WCDPA.com
Above, a map of the Turtle Creek Watershed, part of the Westmoreland Conservation District’s Integrated Water Resource Plan.

Last year, one of the Westmoreland Conservation District’s rain gauges measured 72 inches of total rainfall — far above the typical 40 to 45 inches that the region sees annually.

“It really brought home the stormwater issues we have,” said Kathy Hamilton, stormwater technician and landscape architect at the conservation district. “It made the bad issues worse, and in some places, it happened multiple times.”

Conservation district officials will host two question-and-answer sessions Tuesday and Wednesday, Feb. 19 and 20, regarding the county’s Integrated Water Resources Plan. The plan was developed over the past two years with an eye toward managing and mitigating Westmoreland’s stormwater issues.

The plan will become part of the county’s update of its overall comprehensive plan, which sets out goals and serves as a vision for development and land use.

The draft plan was completed late last year, and a printed copy was delivered to every municipality in the county for public review over the past month or so.

“The plan has to be accepted by the county, and then it has to go to the (state’s Department of Environmental Protection) for approval to meet (state-mandated) stormwater requirements,” Hamilton said.

A large part of the study, funded by a $350,000 grant from the Richard King Mellon Foundation, looked at heavily developed areas of the county where stormwater runoff is likely to carry more sediment and pollution into local waterways.

“We were able to identify some of the ‘hot spots’ in the county where projects can be targeted, and where we can try and find places to apply some of the grant funding we’ll pursue,” Hamilton said.

Examples of “hot spots” include places like Irwin, Jeannette and heavily developed parts of Murrysville, “places where you have a lot of development, and streams that are impacted by runoff from that development,” Hamilton said.

Communities subject to the state’s municipal separate stormsewer system, or MS4, regulations, are required to develop a stormwater ordinance.

“The plan sort of serves not only as a one-stop shop for anyone looking to do development in the county, but also as a model stormwater ordinance for municipalities,” Hamilton said.

Some flexibility was built into the model ordinance so that more-urban areas like Greensburg and Jeannette can set parameters “that work for them, as opposed to a place like Bell Township which is more rural and won’t have the same sorts of issues,” Hamilton said.

The full plan is available online at WestmorelandStorm Water.org.

Question-and-answer sessions are set for 6 p.m., Tuesday, Feb. 19 and 3 p.m., Wednesday, Feb. 20, at the J. Roy Houston Conservation Center, 218 Donohoe Road, Hempfield.

[NOTE: A previous version of this story listed the Q&A dates incorrectly.]

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, pvarine@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.